Sexists, Racists and Conservatives
Okay. Here's the thing. I've never liked Conservatives. I don't trust them. I think they're big, fat, pasty-arsed liars who will say anything, smear anybody, do whatever it takes - to keep others from obtaining the rights they enjoy, pretty much by birthright.
And yet, to listen to them, you'd think they were responsible for all the freedoms of Western society. They take credit, the pundits of today, for our advanced civilization (you know, the one bombing Iraq to freedom, or, at least - civil war) and argue that the left is a threat to all that is right. And good. Meanwhile, they actively support the antithesis of social progress.
They're liars. Chest-thumping liars. They aren't responsible for any progress in our society. Progress was made by citizens going up against the Patriarchy, the Establishment, the Status Quo - to gain expanded rights for all citizens, including Conservatives. It has been the left, on this continent, that agitated for progressive reform. Conservatives stood in the way. They smeared, they informed, they did everything they could think of to prevent other citizens from enjoying the same rights and freedoms they were born into.
They're closed-minded territorial tyrants. Like dogs with bones.
So, having said ALL THAT, I don't believe for a second that they care about the people of Iraq or the people of Afghanistan. I know them to be lying when they claim that they do. I know this because they don't even care about my rights and freedoms. They'd rather I had less economic freedom, less social freedom, and less reproductive freedom.
Less, less, less. They'd take away my freedoms if they could. And since they very clearly would do that, why would I trust what they say about anything?
Which brings me to Stephen Harper and his not-so-hidden agenda. Now, to my mind, the second Stephen Harper called the Liberal leadership candidates "Anti-Israel" for questioning his policies in the Middle East, he should have been shunned. Like how the Mennonites do it. Absolutely and unequivocably shunned.
Because he's a thug. That's what thugs do. They impugn the reputations of people who question the Establishment. That it happened to the Liberal leadership candidates and that they were all too self-interested to act as a united front against our PM, thug-at-large, says all you need to know about them - that they're Liberals.
Not as bad as Conservatives but only because they aren't Conservatives.
And since we all know now that George W. Bush and Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld are really truly awful people and the worst most pathological liars with borderline personalities exhibiting psychopathic behaviours - why are they still here running the world?
Why do Conservatives insist on supporting the War on Terror and any and all other policies of Conservative governments?
I'll tell you why. Because they are also truly awful people and the worst most pathological liars with borderline personalities exhibiting psychopathic behaviours.
And also, because they are, at heart, and in their brains - sexist and racist. They don't want women to have equal rights because they don't want women to be free to not procreate. White, western women, that is. They don't want women going after THEIR jobs. They don't want women thinking they are as good as men. They really, when you come right down to it, want to be able to hit them and not be punished by society for it. They want women to go back to being "theirs". To being property. Just like they want the right to hit their kids. Because they do. That's what spanking is - it's hitting. Conservatives want the right to absolute authority over their children. Father knows best. Not the state. Father.
And certainly not that feminist lesbian bitch - the single mother.
And the procreation thing matters because it points to a generic Conservative racism. Conservatives don't want white western women to enjoy reproductive freedom because they are afraid it will lead to the Islamic Menace taking over the western world and taking away their freedoms - freedoms that people on the left fought so hard to win - for them and everybody else. (Because even birthright didn't give Conservatives the rights they enjoy today - thanks to social agitators and progressive activists.) They want to restrict MY rights now, to save THEIR rights in the future. Maybe. If the Islamic Menace is all they are cracking it up to be.
So yeah. I'm angry. And there's a debate going on in and around the internet about Conservatives and who they are and blahblahblah. I don't see the need, myself. They are telling us who they are all the time. I'm not sure why - but I guess they are truly that far gone. When you piece it together, you'll see what I mean. You need only to read a newspaper once in a blue moon to wonder if you're in a time warp and have been transported back in time a couple of hundred years. Try it. Read a National Post editorial one of these days. They are quite unbelievable - given my reality, anyway. That's why I don't even pick up a newspaper anymore. Conservative points of view? Why? Are they underrepresented in politics? In multi-national corporations? In the establishment anywhere in the world?
No. They aren't. So why are their views represented in the press. Shouldn't the press be the one place where Conservative views are not allowed? They have all the power. They're doing what they have always done - running the world their way and to their advantage. Their sole modus operandi is to deny others their rights because of their primitive brain miswiring that tells them expanded rights for others means fewer rights for them.
Conservatives. Yuck. Who needs 'em. Not the press, that's for sure. But I guess nothing's sacred.

