Lyin' Schreibin'
Here's what I don't get. A guy charged with fraud, bribery, etc keeps copious records of his activities and the activities of others that are then entered into the record of a public inquiry as evidence after much blather and ballyhoo - based on what? That they're the records of a guy charged with fraud and bribery?
So? How is that evidence?
And since he's already contradicted himself a million times that we know of already, why are we listening to his "testimony" still?
Good grief.
If he tells us next that Stephen Harper is the only good politician left on Parliament Hill, then I say we put an end to the charade and deport him.
Although, I am starting to sense Stephen Harper is a pretty good politician. Just not in a good sense.
