It's War, Man, War, I Tells Ya
Suppose someone from the CHRC posted offensive speech bait on a white supremacist site and then nailed whoever snatched at it with an offensive speech complaint to the CHRC.
Or suppose someone from the CHRC DIDN'T post offensive speech bait on a white supremacist site and nailed a poster with an offensive speech complaint, ANYWAY - you know, because it was a white supremacist site and most of the posts were offensive and so he just picked a bunch attributable to a single poster and complained to the CHRC about her.
Okay. Now suppose some Internetters STILL thought a CHRC guy, or former CHRC guy, even, actually DID do the (for lack of a better term) "entrapment" thingy and they (and they'd been building up a really big head of steam about this guy ALREADY because they HATED the CHRC) got madder'n ever and posted a bunch of libellous stuff about him - BECAUSE, as I say, it turns out he DIDN'T actually do the "entrapment" thingy.
BUT, going a little further up and in, what if the same guy who DIDN'T do the "entrapment" thingy is the same guy who put it out there on the Internet that he DID do the "entrapment" thingy - THEREBY "entrapping" this whole group of Internetters who hate him A LOT and who have been sort of, kind a, pretty much, libelling him ANYWAY, into libelling him ABSOLUTELY, so that he could then skip the CHRC complaint process altogether and take this BIG group of bait snatchers to court for LIBEL instead of bothering with NOT baiting, but merely PRETENDING to bait, white supremacists on white supremacist sites that he would then make complaints against to the CHRC.
Wouldn't THAT just be the craziest? Or just desserts? Or a can of worms? Or SOMETHING?
