I’m currently being spammed by a bot and just deleting my spam folder wholesale so if you’re a newcomer wanting to comment hold off for a day or two until it moves on please.
These bots are a curious thing. There’s no point to them, as far as I can tell, and yet, there go they, pretending to offer deals on this and that, praising my web blog for its timely information on this important topic, providing links guaranteed based on bot testimonials to increase traffic to my site.
My Conservative friend, who set up this website, is having serious car woes and is also preoccupied with his American ladyfriend and not much use to me anymore save for a rare drive to Costco and/or Canadian Tire for a few items. It’s all good, though, because by the time we actually get to Costco or Canadian Tire, I’ve forgotten all about whatever it is I thought I needed or improvised with stuff I already have or decided it’s not worth the time, effort and cost of making or installing whatever it is I thought would do the trick.
I have issues with money and can always justify not using it to calm my issues with everything else in life.
I’ll be very relieved when it’s all over, so remember that when you’re sobbing big globby tears all over your keyboard at the news of my passing, if such a day should ever come.
I’m agnostic on death.
I’m not agnostic on Richard Dawkins, though, so don’t tell him I said that, please. He’s had quite enough with people like me. But really, I think he should go to Russia and manage Pussy Riot, where challenging the notion that an all powerful being communicates through men in elaborate costumes can land a girl band in prison.
Pussy Riot needs you, Richard Dawkins!
You’ll be relieved to know that at Costco I picked up a big bag of frozen fruit for my osteoporosis prevention smoothies – Smmmosteos – which I make with filtered 3% milk.
I have no idea what it means to filter milk, but I’m a sucker sometimes for certain words used in association with other certain words.
Also, a big box of chicken nuggets made with white meat (because chicken nuggets made with dark meat didn’t fly with the consuming public, I guess) that I’ll eat between two slices of white bread with lots of mayonnaise. I may invest in some lettuce to go with my chicken nugget sandwiches, lettuce that I’ll wash in a bowl with some cold tap water and a bit of vinegar.
One of the women on those camping with lesbians trips I can’t afford to do right now was in the army and she shared the vinegar tip with me.
No, it’s not that I can’t afford it, I just don’t like camping and no longer wish to pay for the privilege of doing it with lesbians, no matter how skilled they are at wilderness cooking.
That’s me being bad and breaking all my random foodie rules (eating chicken nugget standwiches), which are based partly on my favourite political quote, Anna Lappe’s “every time you spend money, you’re casting a vote for what kind of world you want” and partly on Scottish Presbyterianism Gone Wild. And I’ve never tried it, but I will one day, a friend from the old days at the caucus, an Irish lass who was a dead ringer for Marianne Faithful, who, in my opinion, ranks as one of the most beautiful women in the world, used to put potato chips between two slices of white bread with lots of mayonnaise after a night out at the pub.
It would have to be Miss Vicky’s for me to enjoy it, though. Lays in a pinch.
We had a lot of fun together, my Irish friend and I, although never over “chip sandwiches”. She was always careful to keep me separate from whoever her boyfriend was at the time, after one of her ex-husbands called her up to ask after my health.
She told him I had just recently acquired herpes (not true – I have a horseshoe up my ass!) and to steer clear.
It wasn’t even that she was a jealous type (although she was) she just didn’t want to be bothered. She was an incredible slattern, as I recall, and terrible with money. She also walked away from a fortune inherited by her ne’erdowell ex that would eventually go to her daughter, an only grandchild. I guess she’d be in her late 30s now.
Crap, too old for my son, who could use a fortune to marry.
My son? Hell, too old for Peter MacKay!
Also, she was a vegetarian, which in the 80s didn’t include fish and/or eggs, or she’d have died of malnutrition.
Here’s a funny story about her. She managed to find herself, after a couple of unsatisfactory digs (and being related to the Queen, as all assorted British immigrants to Canada inevitably are) an apartment in a house in one of those perpetually up-and-coming black holes of downtown Toronto that for some inexplicable reason met with her standards of what’s what. Except that the carpet, she decided, need redoing and so it was that she called in a consultant from Sears to have a look.
It was the only time I was ever in a residence of hers, such was her determination to keep me well away from her boyfriends, who weren’t my type anyway, since I had my now ex the entire time I knew her, and I wish I’d had a video camera to record the reaction of the consultant from Sears as she surveyed the dingy abode the anemic looking renter in thrift shop raggery was planning to have re-carpeted.
Finally, after about half an hour of swatches and gibby gabbing about light through greasy front north facing windows and no light at all from east or west, I suggested we get down to the nitty gritty of quotes.
And so the consultant from Sears quoted the price for the lovely dune shade of sisal, assuming living-room and stairs only, and my friend looked at me, and then back at the consultant from Sears, and so I added, “She means per square foot, P.”
Because, of course, she had no idea, did she. And so the maniacal laughter and even the consultant from Sears joined in after a while and P. swore her to secrecy, and me, too, although I told everybody as soon as we got back to the office because it was just so funny and so P. that she thought she could afford wall-to-wall carpeting from Sears when she couldn’t even afford its footwear.
But that reminds me, too, of another Irish friend from the old days at the caucus. She’s now a spokesperson for gay and lesbian rights and whatnot and she and P. and I were talking one day, or rather, they were talking about Dublin, and I asked, “What was it like, though, growing up with all that violence?”
“Well, you know, the IRA, Northern Ireland right next door. All that violence.”
“Oh well, that’s Belfast. We lived in Dublin. The troubles in Belfast are as far away from Dublin as they are from Toronto.”
And, you know, P. might think that of anything anywhere but H. was/is very well-informed politically and so that always stuck with me because she was being very honest about how unaffected she was by the violence in Belfast growing up in Dublin.
But apparently, after the Berlin Wall came down, it was a difficult adjustment for West Germans because East Germans, their kin, were as politically different from them as, apparently, half the Scots of Scotland are from the Scots of Great Britain, and so on and so forth and more of the same etc etc.
There isn’t strength in numbers, though, is there, or 1% of the people of the world wouldn’t essentially own it, would they.
But be cheered, my Conservative friend let it slip that he is now one of them, or, at least, his company is, the 1%, and he’s no closer to having his serious car woes solved than I would be if I owned a car with faulty brakes because, you know, life in Canada reached its peak in the 70s (under PET, but that’s me interjecting) when we had all that we needed, which is sex, drugs, and rock & roll (that’s him, so I interjected again with how much I like having a house, but he interjected back that you could have a house in the 70s, too, or, at least, your parents could) and that nothing that has happened since, particularly to do with technology, has improved our lives in the slightest.
That’s the field that got him to the 1%, by the way, technology, although to be fair, his father was probably pretty close to the 1% back in the 70s, if we’d thought to have such a thing in the good old days instead of just a spreading middle-class country of immigrants voting for peace, order and good government.
Oh wait, we are, ISIL is cancer, isn’t it.
That’s what Obama calls ISIL, anyway. Cancer. And he’s going to perform bombing surgery on it.
I lurve “Boring Obama” below. Every time I look at it I laugh. Whoever took the photo should get the Nobel Peace Prize.
I know what you’re thinking, rightwing lunatics, “Yabbut, you’d say anybody but Stephen Harper should get the Nobel Peace Prize, Sooey”.
It’s true. Tabatha Southey, who I’ll read later today, after the man of the house buys the Saturday Globe (funny, isn’t it, what gender decides), apparently has a piece in today lamenting that Stephen Harper gets to be the Prime Minister at the same time when a ship from that damned Franklin expedition is discovered.
I can’t be happy about anything that might give credit to Stephen Harper. He could solve climate change and I’d be shaking my head that he only did it for himself.
Ooh. Could somebody convince Stephen Harper that if he solved climate change he’d only be doing it for himself, please?!
Omigawd, way to solve climate change much, Sooey?
By the way, it took me several looks before I even noticed the woman in the photo, who is camouflaged as the flag. My sister-in-law, after I emailed “Boring Obama” to her and my brother (and my kids, my mom, my ex, etc) suggested, “Maybe it’s the artwork”.
Check out the artwork. So boring. I didn’t notice it, either. Heck it took me a few seconds to notice the kid trying to smother himself in the couch, Obama is so boring.
I may commission my daughter, who’s a fabulously talented artist, to copy the artwork for me to put above the couch. Or maybe I’ll blow up “Boring Obama” and put it above the couch and the copied artwork on the wall opposite.
I actually tweeted about blowing up “Boring Obama” on 9/11, if you can believe it. I know, eh? Lucky to be here on 9/13, that’s for sure.
Okay, it was accidental on purpose.
When the kids were little I bought high-quality postcards for them to do artwork on and send to their grandmother, who also paints. Anyway, I just tossed it off to them as a little make work project to keep them busy, something I had to be careful about in future because, o.mi.god. My oldest, having been given an assignment, perused her library reference book about birds, and painstakingly reproduced a photograph of an eagle.
Using Crayola water paint pencils.
It looks like a Bateman.
I kept it as a reminder that children aren’t ours, they’re other people, more like children everywhere than adults anywhere, and they have a different appreciation of time, space, energy, and so on and so forth and more of the same etc etc.
It’s important to pay attention sometimes.
I experience that in my retail job, too, working with the university girls. It’s a privilege, really, to revisit vicariously that time in my own life. We do grow old, though, even in this sibling society of ours that Conservatives so much want to deny, and while it may not always be mental/emotional, it sure as hell is physical.
I have to limber up in the mornings now or I creak.
Speaking of “Boring Obama”, some smart-alec (aleck?) put together a slide show, currently making the rounds of Facebook, of the past four presidents all announcing to Americans that it was time to bomb Iraq.
George Bush Sr, Clinton, George Bush Jr, and Obama.
Isn’t it weird that that nattering nabob of negativity, Dick Cheney, won’t shut up and go away but George Bush Jr. has gracefully retired to paint portraits of men in suits?
It would be nice if young men (and women, although I’m with Gloria Steinem, not just on the misanthropy of war, but on the misogyny female soldiers are expected to ignore from men here while they wage war on men there) just stopped signing up and politicians had to run for re-election on re-instating the draft.
Or didn’t, and just re-instated it, because we’ve become that powerless in our own democracies, and everybody was forced to wake up and smell the coffee.
I’m feeling bullied by men on the internet into pretending to care that Rob Ford may or may not have a life threatening illness that has caused him to drop out of the race for mayor and down into a race for councilor, while his other brother, Doug, scrambles to file registration papers on time so he can take his place in the mayor’s chair.
Eff off, eh? (I’m trying to cut down on swearing.) No, I don’t give a rat’s ass about Rob Ford. He’s just another dangerous man in a world run by dangerous men.
Head’s up, by the way, when the rumour was that he had a blockage in his colon, lots of possibilities came to mind as to who it might be.
Yup. Joe Warmington, come on down, you win!
(I have no idea who Joe Warmington is, so don’t shoot me, I’m just the messenger.)
I figure if the men of power and politics really cared about Rob Ford themselves, who was acting an awful lot like Lady MacBeth, if you ask me, which no one ever does, they’d ask him if he knows what happened to Jaclyn Dawe, missing since February 9, 2013 (when rumours of the crack smoking video first surfaced), her car abandoned outside 51 Benway (where the crack smoking took place).
I can’t be the only woman who wonders if Rob Ford knows anything about what happened to Jaclyn Dawe. Or maybe Stephen Harper knows. He seems to know a lot about missing Aboriginal girls and women, enough not to feel the need for a national inquiry into their whereabouts, anyway.
Oh what I’d give to be a fly on the rod of one of their fishing trips together, although I suspect it’s just another fabricated relationship.
“Owen doesn’t have any friends!”
For sure we won’t find ourselves basking beside the men of power and politics in the reflected glory of another politician’s passing. Or not. Whatever. Even Jesus didn’t care about EVERYBODY. Remember the vendors in the temple?
Grr. I hate it when politicos pretend they’re better than Jesus.
Anyway, go look at “Boring Obama”. It’s funny. Even ISIL thinks so.
And ISIL doesn’t have cancer, it is cancer.
I tell my kids, it’s not the other person, it’s the relationship, and all sorts of factors that are beyond your control can have an effect on the relationship.
To drive it home, I tell them that if I was looking, and met their dad today, I might rope him off from the herd and live happily ever after.
Although, I might just leave him to somebody else and instead get a groovy bachelorette somewhere hip and happening and live out my days as a party of one.
There’s always the internet for company. In fact, that’s sometimes the problem, isn’t it.
A friend in university who used to steal all our boyfriends away from us because she was a 5’2″ blond gymnast who liked sex once told me she stayed away from dildos because she was worried they might be better than the real thing.
So yes, I told two friends, and they told two friends, and she ended up getting 64 dildos for her birthday.
As I blogged a while back, I read an Anne Tyler novel, one of many that I’ve read over the years, and in this one the wife/mother walks away, literally, from her life in one town to start a new one down the highway.
The ending is disappointing and satisfying at once, in that she ends up back home, everyone a year further along in life. I was attracted to her spartan new life (and liked her more for it), but I could feel myself growing suspicious when she became Mary Poppins to a divorced father and son and extended family, all of whom seemed to be at an earlier stage of development than the family she had left behind.
Anne Tyler always errs on the side of the side of the original marriage. But the older I get, the less frustrated it makes me that she does.
I was on the dog walk (a commenter asked for a good dog story, to compensate for my bad dawg story of two days ago, so unfair, really) with my Beau today and as usual I chatted the entire time and as usual he didn’t scream, “Shut up! Just shut up, you crazy stupid yakking bitch! Can’t you see I’m t’inkin’!” Not that my ex did, either, but I didn’t chat to him as much because by the time we had a dog, we had three kids, too, and I walked the dog by myself and he played video games in the basement.
Yeah, yeah, the kids hung out together doing whatever. Get off our backs.
(And actually, my ex did delight in yelling, “Shut yer trap, I’m t’inkin’!”, but it was all in good fun. We’d just be sitting there and I’d start, “So”, and he’d yell, “Shut yer trap, I’m t’inkin’!” He also delighted in yelling, “Godabed!” whenever one of the kids would approach him to fix a toy or somesuch. It was a riff on that AA commercial featuring the drunk dad sitting in his armchair and the kid asking him to fix his broken truck and the drunk dad fumbles around for a bit and then yells “Godabed!” We laughed ourselves silly over it. All of us. It was hilarious. Every. Single. Effin’. Time.)
“Shut yer trap! I’m t’inkin’!”
“Dad? Can you -”
But he has a better relationship with a different woman and I have a better relationship with a different man and even if I didn’t I’d rather have a groovy bachelorette on my own now than another romantic relationship.
I read an angry rant today posted on my FB page by a young woman about how racist and sexist and victim-blaming we’re all being with regard to the girlfriend, now wife, of the football player who knocked her out cold. She’s angry that we’re watching video replays of the elevator assault, and wants us to stop.
But while I agree it’s invasive, I don’t think there’s much to be done about it. And while we should empathize more than we do “victims’ rights” is just a manipulative and cynical component of the larger agenda by Conservative politicians to roll back civil liberties and meddle/muscle in our system of justice.
We should all enjoy the same rights, no need for special ones.
But when I saw her lying there in her short skirt it brought back an unseen image of my daughter in the early days of grade ten passed out drunk in the washroom at a high school dance.
I got a call from the vice-principal, could I please come and pick up my daughter, she’s passed out drunk in the girls’ washroom.
“Omigawd! Is she okay?”
“She’s fine. The police are with her.”
“The police?! Omigawd!”
“No, no, the police were already here, they were here anyway, she’s fine, we just need you to come and pick her up.”
But I couldn’t pick her up because I didn’t (and still don’t) have a car, but, of course, she told the vice-principal to call me because she didn’t want to involve her dad. Alas, he had the car and so had to be called.
And after he picked her up, he dropped her off, at my place, refusing even to help me get her out of the car and up to my apartment.
Okay. Now I’m mad all over again. That, was not cool, not cool at all.
But before the uncool drop-off and while I was still on the phone to the vice-principal, she advised me that my daughter would be suspended for two days.
“Okay. I guess. But look, isn’t that just stigmatizing her further? I mean, I don’t want her to be that girl who showed up drunk at the school dance.”
At which point the vice-principal didn’t laugh, exactly, but I’m pretty sure I heard her eyes roll.
“No, no, you don’t understand. This happens all the time. It happens during school hours. There’s no stigma. It’s not about stigma. The suspension is to provide a break between the event and the behaviour we want from students when they’re on school property.”
“Oh. Okay. Well, you’ll have to call her dad because he has the car.”
Discipline isn’t my thing, worry is my thing, and it was hard to get rid of the image of my daughter lying on the washroom floor in her cute little dress, barf in her hair, etc etc etc. So while she barfed all night into a bucket (so she wouldn’t have to get up and make it to the bathroom, of which we only had the one) her younger brother got a teaching moment and her older sister got the mom-needed info that there was nothing more to the event than a mixture of household booze obtained at a friend’s place.
Did I tell you we all lived in a one bedroom apartment together every weekend for seven years?
That’s several years ago now and I don’t know if anyone took photos of her in that state but later in her life when someone took photos of her in another state (and state) and then tried to blackmail her into marrying him, and she finally decided to tell me the truth about her mysterious comings and goings, I advised her, “Well, I guess you’d better marry him, then.”
“Well, I don’t see that you have any choice.”
Because, of course, I did. And so did she. And then to make her feel better I said, “By the way, don’t tell anybody but I made a sex tape and posted it on the internet and now it’s gone totally viral. Okay. You can tell everybody. Too late. I already did.”
So the girlfriend, now wife, of the football player who knocked her out cold is upset that, thanks to the media, a video of the event is there for anybody with internet access to watch (and they played it on The National last night, with a warning by Peter Mansbridge that it is “hard to watch”, even though it isn’t).
The whole media circus is having a negative effect on their new life together as man and wife, she says, and the young woman author of the piece I read this morning concurs.
(It seems these days like all days the woman in the news is always just the girlfriend or wife or pregnant, and the man is always SOMEBODY, and the baby is going to be SOMEBODY, most likely our future King, and so on and so forth and more of the same etc etc.)
I suppose it does take away from the honeymoon, a video on the nightly news of your new husband knocking you out cold back when you were just his girlfriend. Also, he’s not a football player anymore, just some putz in anger management counseling to avoid jail time.
And yeah, Rihanna, to whom a poster of inspirational quotes making the rounds of Facebook is dedicated, a sample of which includes, “I ain’t got no fucks to give”, well, sure, she can go on from being punched in the face by Chris Brown to joining him in holy matrimony, too, her choice, no one’s got a gun to her head, unless and until he does, but whatever.
And yet, maybe we’ve come a long way, baby, when a young woman can publish an angry rant in support of another young woman’s wish that we all unwatch a video of her being knocked out cold by her now husband so that they can enjoy their newly married lives together in peace and harmony.
While other women send tweets to #WhyIStayed, using the internet to send messages of support, encouragement, and understanding to themselves, each other, and the rest of us.
Breathe in, breathe out, and repeat after me: Ours is not to reason why, ours is but to empathize.
The title’s a riff on Marlene Dietrich’s “Where Have All the Flowers Gone”, which I learned in grade two, along with “Red Rubber Ball” and “Winchester Cathedral”.
Our teacher, Miss R, was a drug addict/alcoholic who was into music and creepy stories, like “I Am Joe’s Spine” from Reader’s Digest, and “The Search for the Girl with the Blue (Green?) Eyes”, which was a book about reincarnation.
Several years later she took to calling our house, slurred remembrances of things past that I’m pretty sure had nothing to do with me, but by then my older sister and brother were gone and there was a possibility the call might be for me so I always answered the phone when it rang.
It never was, except for the times when it was Miss R. Finally, I told my mom about it and the next time Miss R called my mom told her to lay off the booze. I’m not sure if she was more weirded out that Miss R had been calling our house or that I had been taking her calls, but that was the end of that.
It’s funny, I don’t think of my mother as being very involved in my life growing up, in a protective sense I mean, but I’m still here, so I guess she was, somewhat, at least.
Still, it was an awfully subtle kind of caring.
I’m more of an internet addict than my kids are, and communicate on it without reservation, as if I’m writing a letter to my friend E. that I will then have delivered to her home by post, so that she can read it a week hence from its writing, and not posting it online for anyone anywhere with internet access to read anytime.
But it’s all outward bound, my addiction, offloading into cyber space. I want to be read, yes, that’s why I write, and I welcome commentary, but I put it out there and leave it.
And it’s true, I am my biggest fan.
But that’s not what this entry is about, because this entry is about a somewhat revealing non-fact mentioned, almost in passing, on The National the other night. It had to do with all the young men headed over to Syria to fight with ISIL, the non-fact being how a majority of Canadians supposedly feel about it.
I call it a non-fact because it was just a random bit of possible information gleaned from a poll, so meaningless, really, but it also more or less reflected how I realized I feel, particularly after seeing, on The National, night after night, a clip of young men ripping up their passports, throwing them into the fire, and threatening, “We’re coming for you, Canada”.
Oh really? How? You just burned your passports.
Later, on another episode of The National, when I hear that they’ve been killed while fighting with ISIL (or more likely, not fighting with ISIL, but that’s not the point here) I think of the clip, since played over and over and over on The National, of them ripping up their passports, throwing them into the fire, and threatening, “We’re coming for you, Canada”.
As if they weren’t Canadian, no doubt having learned how to start a passport burning fire at YMCA camp.
Like me, the poll claims, more Canadians don’t care about young jihadis going over to Syria to fight for ISIL, than do – as long as they don’t come back.
Which, well, without passports…
The National doesn’t mention how Canadians feel about our young jihadis dying over in Syria, but I can tell you, having seen the clip, many times, of them ripping up their passports, throwing them into the fire, and threatening, “We’re coming for you, Canada”, well, c’est la vie, eh?
And yet, when I first saw the clip it struck me as a transparent attempt to manipulate me into feeling anger towards Muslims, and I couldn’t believe that other Canadians wouldn’t feel that way, too.
I mean, what do we really know about who/where/why or even when?
But after seeing it again and again and again, I became annoyed. If the Canadians polled were people like me, people who’d seen that clip a dozen or so times, no wonder they’re hoping for one-way trips.
Ungrateful little shits.
But, you know, imagine if Canadians saw a clip of Stephen Harper telling American Republicans over and over night after night on The National: “Canada is a northern European welfare state in the worst sense of the term, and very proud of it. If you’re like all Americans, you know almost nothing about countries other than your own. Which makes you more knowledgeable about at least one country more than most Canadians.”
We’d be just as happy if he didn’t return home from selling us out abroad to multinational corporate psychopaths on what by now must be frequent flyer points, wouldn’t we.
Okay. Be honest. It wouldn’t even take hearing him describe us as lazy and stupid.
I read the Saturday Globe because I like the columnists in it and even when I don’t agree, necessarily, I appreciate the considered opinion.
I always agree with Elizabeth Renzetti, though, sort of, almost. Did you know she’s married to Doug Saunders? I kind of agree with him, too, a bit, mostly.
I wonder if they run their columns by each other until they’ve reached a certain level of agreeableness before sending them to their editors (does the Globe still have editors, I wonder?) who exclaim in agreement, “Yes! Sort of! Almost! Close enough to what I might have thought!”
But I think it was the Saturday Citizen that had an article about an author, Michael Harris – (I don’t know if it’s the same Michael Harris of iPolitics or not, the fellow who shouts into the wind about how awful Stephen Harper is as both a politician and a person) – who took himself off the internet for a month because he found himself addicted to it.
I have to stop commenting on the only blog I do because I realized yesterday, finally, that I don’t like who I become when I do.
The other day at one of my groups – (I’ll just just use its initials “AA” so as not to give away which one) – a friend expressed shock that I get worked up about opinions expressed by others – (i.e. men, but also women – I just react more carefully because I am one and I’ve been stalked and harassed and slandered and yadda yadda blah blah) – on the internet.
“I don’t believe it! You?”
Well, you can imagine if you’ve witnessed how frustrated I can get on the only blog I comment on that I would think she was kidding.
She wasn’t. She was serious. She couldn’t imagine me getting worked up over a political blog on the internet because I’m so calm and reasonable.
Okay. That’s enough. You can stop laughing now.
Anyway, it turns out that she isn’t always the wise and forbearing soul at home that she is at “AA”, either. Although I’m sure she’s very funny.
Or maybe she isn’t. Maybe her sense of humour flies out the window of her kitchen when another adult wanders in to ask “what’s for dinner?” and she throws spoons at him and runs to her bedroom in tears, so tired is she of taking responsibility for what passes down his neverending gullet.
Yes, that was passive aggression.
Myself, I lose perspective. It’s a rut thing and the only way to get out of it is to hop to the side and find another way to get there. Or not go. Or go somewhere else. As I unwittingly included in a swipe at the blogger “the combinations and permutations are endless”. But now that I’ve recognized the problem – my reaction – I can do something about it.
So I read Margaret Wente and I don’t really agree with anything but I do recognize bits and pieces and ditto Christie Blatchford and I come away thinking it interesting that they have such a different perspective on it all. Even Barbara Amiel I can read and think “my, she’s such a clever bullshitter, Canada’s own Becky Sharp”.
That may be an old Frank magazine reference, by the way. They used to have a lot of fun with Babs.
Anyway, one of the other commenters on the blog I will now spare my insights – (I know, passive aggression, but I’m a woman after all, worse, a mother) – accused, no, suggested, that I come across on it as anti-male.
Well, okay. Certainly it’s his opinion that I come across as anti-male, or he wouldn’t have accused, I mean, suggested that I do.
But then he said that the “men here have your back”, and I’m afraid my anti-man-o-meter went up to 11 and instead of allowing him to pretend to himself that it’s true, I commented that it isn’t, that men don’t have my back, that men don’t have any woman’s back.
That they don’t even have our front and that’s where our tits are.
Now, please, bear with me. I’m not talking about you, and me, and our relationship with each other here or even there. I’m talking about the roles we play in various contexts.
Sometimes, I flashback to playing an eight year old girl and widow’s child being lectured by a friend’s father who beats his wife and daughters about women’s lip and Trudeau and how together they’ll destroy the cushy life he’s made for his women.
I’m not misremembering (which a former bookclubber insists is not a word but the computer didn’t underline it whereas it underlined bookclubber) such scenarios. My friend later turned to religion and was killed by a drunk driver coming home from a revival meeting, her sister witnessing it all from the car behind.
Another Highway of Tears – Hwy 17 North.
I remember wearing a paper Trudeau dress, going door-to-door, delivering pamphlets, grown men yelling at me, open handed threats, slamming doors.
I didn’t intend for this entry to go here, by the way, but here is where it’s gone.
My friend B. who worked so hard doing communications for the NDP caucus at Queen’s Park back in the day that they took her completely for granted and made sure she never got the promotion she deserved, used to say of No Fault Divorce, “Thank you Mother Mary for Pierre Elliot Trudeau”.
She wasn’t Catholic, but she’s a Philosopher Queen.
And I haven’t talked to her about it but I know she’d feel like I do about Justin Trudeau putting it out there for everybody to hear and know that if you aren’t pro-choice, don’t bother running as a candidate for the Liberal Party of Canada.
See, the NDP was/is pro-choice, decided at policy conventions, yadda yadda blah blah, but, well, its members aren’t necessarily, and while that doesn’t really bother the men of the NDP so much, it bothered and bothers the women.
They just won’t out with it, that’s all. You’d almost think it was no big deal, the fundamental human and civil right to the legal right, at the very least, to not bring an unwanted pregnancy to term, so not insistent are women on the left that men on the left be pro-choice if they want to represent their party on the national stage.
I don’t necessarily agree with Justin Trudeau, much, often, sometimes. He can say that no country in the world would leave all that oil in the ground but it’s still a fact that we should be the country that does, because it’s not oil we’re leaving in the ground, it’s carbon. And I think Tom Mulcair is principled and intelligent and deserving of being Prime Minister.
But it’s a big deal to me that a male politician finally acted like a leader, even for women, and said “enough” to this ongoing male-dominated debate about what should not be up for debate, the legal right of female citizens to not bring pregnancy to term.
Rape, failed birth control, drunken mistake, change in circumstances. It’s not my or your business why and it’s the least men can do for women – ensure that abortion is legal. They can add safe and rare if they want. I don’t care. Just please, no more publicly funded legislators spending all their time and effort trying to re-criminalize it.
Men on the left may see what Justin Trudeau has done as no biggie, but women on the left know better whether they speak up and say so or not.
And no, I don’t characterize what he’s done as having my back. I characterize it as doing the right thing. By everybody. It’s not a favour to women, he’s not doing us a solid, he’s recognizing and acting on systemic sexism.
He’s contributing towards equality.
But it occurs to me, too, that he’s a younger man than we’re used to leading political parties, whose mother left his father and went on to have a whole other life out from under. I live with a man who’s had that experience, too. And he has friends. It’s my opinion that these men are better for it, but it could be that they’ve just grown up in a more equal world than did people my own age.
The fact is, his experience informs his politics just like my experience informs mine, and in spite of our opposite gender, difference in age, and contrasting lifestyles, we seem to have oodles in common when it comes to the sort of country we want Canada to be, or at least the sort of country we’d like it to be.
Anyway, my point is – (and you thought I didn’t have one, didn’t you, admit it) – I take politics personally, I guess, and while men may feel that they’re not getting the political representation that they deserve, from anybody within our first past the post partisan political party yadda yadda blah blah system, it’s my considered opinion – (as a woman, mind) – that maybe we should better synchronize our watches because their timing appears to be off, kinda, sort of, maybe?
Whatever. Only your mother has your back. But you have to call her or she’ll write you out of the will.
Yes, it’s passive aggression.
“Palestinians deserve to die!”
When I was a kid, Joan Rivers was my favourite comedian. She’d show up on the Ed Sullivan show, the antidote to cheesy ol’ Topo Gijio or Charo or any number of boring singers and lame comedians and make my day before bedtime.
I was a very discerning child. My mother was a nazi about bedtime, except on Sunday night when I was allowed to watch Ed Sullivan.
And it’s true what’s being said about her, unlike a lot of people (although not comedians) Joan Rivers never mellowed.
Louis CK is mellowing, though, and I think it makes him even funnier.
He’s going with it, I guess, making mellowing funnier than not mellowing.
Is there anything Louis CK can’t make funny?
Let’s face it, Joan Rivers was more than a comedian, she was a trailblazing diva with a fascinating life. Uncompromisingly and fearlessly mean for the sake of a cheap laugh, a life so publicly lived that for a while there you couldn’t turn on the television without hearing her bare it all in her fabulous rasp.
Ironic that throat surgery did her in, eh?
I remember once on her talk show she had a woman on who ran masturbation workshops. Another time she had on Connie, the groupie, of Grand Funk Railroad fame.
Another time, she had Melissa on, her precious precious only child, a daughter, who showed up in a long plaid shirt and jeans and said to the audience that her father who had just committed suicide was her parent.
Her mother wasn’t a parent, she said.
The best, really, so honest, her life was that open sore as opposed to an open book that my friend A. and I joked about back in the day.
“I wanted pizza, not gonorrhea.”
But Joan Rivers was also a monster whose last words were “Palestinians deserve to die!” shrieked at reporters before she hustled herself into a car.
And why her plastic surgeon hasn’t been charged with committing an indignity to a human body is beyond me. Joan Rivers at the end looked like Carrot Top and Mickey Rourke had a baby, ferchrissakes.
Cher, who was a friend of Joan Rivers, once famously said to critics of her plastic surgery obsession, “I’ll put my tits on my back if I want to”. It was cool, because Cher was cool.
She was also an actress, not a comedian.
She also went through a very uncool phase when she wouldn’t accept Chastity, her daughter, as Chaz, her son. Personally, I don’t think she’ll ever come back from that, although she might. Chaz is pretty uncompromising.
Omigawd, I just realized how hard it must have been for Joan Rivers not to make fun of Sonny’s death by skiing into a tree. Maybe she did. Maybe Cher did, too.
She is an actress, after all. Brilliant in “Come Back to the Five and Dime, Jimmy Dean, Jimmy Dean”. And “Silkwood”, where she went up against her aggressively heterosexual public persona to play a lesbian in love with Meryl Streep.
The Nature of Things the other night linked fecundity in females to homosexuality in men, by the way, so if you’re from a large family you’re probably gay.
It’s not a sexist thing anymore, is it, plastic surgery – it’s a rich thing. A rich celebrity thing, mostly. You’re not getting older, you’re getting weirder looking. It’s all good in Hollywood.
Like Whoopi Goldberg said after “it’s not rape rape”, “it’s Hollywood”.
You can tell by all the weird looking old people, I guess.
But the elephant in the living room when it comes to comedy is that plastic surgery takes away from it. The court jester isn’t believable as funny when s/he looks like one of the people she’s supposed to be making fun of, not one of us.
Also, even if Stephen Harper and Benjamin Netanyahu had a baby, “Palestinians deserve to die!” probably wouldn’t leave ‘im rolling in the aisle.
Okay. It might.
So yeah, can we talk?
The Southern Alberta Institute of Technology has the acronym SAIT, and if you google “terrorists – SAIT”, a Calgary Herald article comes up concerning a couple of brothers currently (allegedly) fighting for ISIS (or whatever the hell it’s called this week) in Iraq or Syria (or wherever the hell ISIS is making gains or losing ground on this day of our Lord September 5, 2014).
Oh shit. Better look out. We’re only a week away from 9/11.
No wait, 4 days. We’re only 4 days away from 9/11.
No wait, 6 days. 9′s the month, 11′s the day. 5 + 6 = 11.
That was quick. It seems like only a dozen years or so since the very day, doesn’t it.
I know, I know. Too soon, Sooey, too soon!
Anyway, apparently the brothers, or, at least, one of the brothers, went to SAIT and played on the Trojans.
Oh, and both brothers lived in an apartment building in Calgary along with all of Canada’s other homegrown terrorists who also attended SAIT.
No word on how many of them played for the Trojans.
Oh, who cares, right? One of those sports involving a ball.
Hey, I just realized how different hockey is from all other sports except badminton!
No wonder Stephen Harper loves hockey so much he had Roy MacGregor write a book about it for him.
Speaking of Stephen Harper, far be it from me to suggest that all of Canada’s homegrown terrorists seem to live in our Prime Minister and Nobel Peace Prize nominee’s own riding, or right next door to it in Jason Kenney’s riding, or well, whichever one of our Alberta Conservative governing MPs Calgary riding has an apartment building full of homegrown terrorists in it.
And/or SAIT, which I’m sure receives funding from at least one level of Canadian government, not that I’m saying it shouldn’t, just that, well, maybe the CRA could do an audit of its alumni association?
Just kidding. That was a joke. The CRA should continue its audits of Canadian organizations involved in important research that benefits all Canadians and not just tarsands developers.
Really, if you stop and think about it, it’s no wonder conspiracy theories end up taking over the internet, because, well, remember how western governments were so reluctant to do anything much about the Assad regime in Syria because the Netanyahu regime in Israel was okay with it, even though the UN believed it was gassing its own citizens to death using a chemical weapons stockpile that, like, supposedly got towed out to sea by… the French?
And good thing (not about the chemical weapons, about the Assad regime) because now we’re pretty much okay with it, too, on account of the blowback from George W Bush’s Mission Accomplished in Iraq (that Stephen Harper supported 100%) that has turned out to be worse than Al Queda, which didn’t operate out of Iraq, anyway, but, oh well.
Well, lots of people, but whatever. Reality, like Saudi Arabia, is mostly irrelevant and don’t bother trying to say it isn’t.
And an Al Queda mullah (a guy with an unholy beard, anyway) says Al Queda’s all about India now so, like, watch out, infidels.
India. Geez Louise. Good luck with all that, Al Queda.
Meanwhile, Stephen Harper, who is often saluted now by members of our armed forces, for some reason no one seems to understand but anyone who can never questions, not that Dear Leader entertains questions about his increasingly bizarre behaviour, anyway, is sending armed forces, so, I guess, troops, to Iraq to fight ISIS.
Too late, I called it. ATNN: Absurdity – the new normal.
I came across the comment below the other day which is in response to a column about our Prime Minister and Nobel Peace Prize nominee’s refusal to hold a national inquiry into missing and murdered Aboriginal girls and women.
Can you imagine how insufferable Stephen Harper will be if he wins the Nobel Peace Prize after the way he’s behaved to date on the world stage, lecturing for more austerity and bellowing for more war, and then stalking off it and back into his $40 million (at last count) security bubble.
The commenter is “as you know/clearly/obviously” (Stephen Harper’s current favourite dialogue squashers, not that he entertains questions from the media anyway) a member of the internet age’s armchair klan, the CCCC (Caucasian Conservative Christian Club) who thinks the brutal truth about Aboriginal men isn’t the brutal truth about, oh, say, Arab men (not that he wouldn’t quickly agree that, yes! them too! once pointed out). Or African American men (yes! them too! he’d nod enthusiastically).
Or Chinese men (er… confused eyebrows).
Or Conservative Christian men (uh… confused eyebrows turned angry eyebrows as he reaches for his law-abiding gun and readies to shoot the pointer outer, little ol’ lilly white Sooey, not Conservative – except in her conservative living habits – and not Christian – although I do ask myself on occasion “What Would Gloria Do?”).
(That’s Gloria Steinem, by the way. And yes, Monica Lewinsky is my favourite celebrity.)
(I know, eh? Date yourself much, Sooey?)
And it’s so true, isn’t it, what Andrew Coyne was recently paid good money to repeat, that men kill more men than they do women, including Aboriginal men (his new twist, I guess) and that those men are just as dead as the unlucky in love female victims of law-abiding gun-owners turned depressed murder/suicides (not that he put it like that, exactly, but you get the gist).
Gosh, too bad we can’t give every man in the CCCC a Nobel Peace Prize, eh?
Or can we?
Well, I think if Stephen Harper wins one we can.
Step right up, Rob Ford, you are the CCCC’s next Nobel Peace Prize winner!
(Speaking of missing, Jaclyn Dawe still is, by the way.)
Fortunately, I don’t comment on but the one blog anymore, Dr. Dawg’s, and I’d like to stop doing even that (so I can get an anecdote down for a series I want to finish by starting) or I’d currently be wasting time pointing out the obvious on someone else’s blog instead of pointing it out here on my own.
While the commenter suddenly steps up to recognize the sad reality that women are more likely to be murdered by a partner than a stranger, it’s just to point fingers at other murderous men, not take responsibility for the murderous ones in the CCCC.
By the way, I nominate Stephen Harper as patron saint of the CCCC.
There’s no point, as I’m learning on Dr. Dawg’s blog (just kidding, I already know there’s no point) in pointing out to the CCCC that women are just as dead when their Aboriginal partners kill them as when their Chinese partners do, and so on and so forth and more of the same etc etc right down to the law-abiding gun-owning femicidal members of the CCCC.
And that more women (and children, and even men) are dead – worldwide – than would be if the finger pointing clan of which Stephen Harper is now patron saint (I had a vote in my head and he won) didn’t sell/give weapons to terrorists, “as we know/clearly/obviously” it does.
It just doesn’t take responsibility for anything, that’s all. Everything is the fault of other men, not members of the CCCC. All the dead women? That’s “their men” killing them, those men who belong to another society, not ours, our society, is led by Stephen Harper, Prime Minister and Nobel Peace Prize nominee.
And patron saint of the CCCC.
Oh hi. You’re up early re-reading Sooey Says.
It’s okay, I re-read my entries, too. I do it because I love myself.
Do you hear me, world? I love myself!
Omigawd – you must love me, too! Well, aren’t we just a bunch of lovey doveys defying this Conservative death cult that surrounds us.
But you’ll be relieved to hear on Labour Day Eve that I’ve given up trying to be a better person and instead plan to just keep moving. Whether it’s with a footprint on my behind or of my own accord, I’m going to just keep on moving. From one group to the next and so on and so forth and more of the same etc etc.
I’m keeping my Beau, though, so back off Beau-snatchers. He reminds me that I’m a free person.
Living by example. No, seriously – how do you live as a free person, men?
Here’s a question I used to pose to the kids when they were worried about something or other (kids have a lot of shit to worry about that they have no control over, so go easy on them, parents) that for some reason I never pose to myself: What’s the worst that can happen?
I recommend it. I even know people for whom the worst has happened. It didn’t destroy them, it made them inspirational.
Okay, now I’m afraid I’ve tempted the gods to make me inspirational so let’s rewind to “What’s the worst that can happen?” and confine our answers to stuff like someone will make a scene, you’ll be fired, and the group will point a collective finger and scream “Out Damn Spot” and security will be called to escort you out the building.
It’s a disease. I have a disease.
Yes, once again, thanks for ruining alcoholism for me, Rob Ford.
Although I suppose staying sober out of spite is as good a reason for staying sober as any other. I do enjoy sobriety. Seriously, I was made for it. Also, as a speaker reminded us recently, “Alcoholism is an allergy of the body and an obsession of the mind”.
It’s funny because it’s true.
But speaking of alcoholism, I return once again to the scene of my personal rock bottom, which was the backyard of a gentleman dawg, later today. I’ll be bringing my famous strawberry pizza, which is: 1/2 cup butter combined with 1/3 cup brown sugar and 1 cup of flour to make a shortbread crust; then cream cheese (I use that new Greek yogurt cream cheese – the whole box, 250 grams?) combined with about 1/4, maybe more, of white sugar to spread over the cooled shortbread crust, and chopped strawberries sugared to sweetness to spread over the cream cheese. Voila! A dessert to amaze and delight gentlemen dawgs everywhere.
By the way, you didn’t ask, but last night my Beau and I headed out for dinner and a movie, but left it at just dinner and returned home to watch “Enough Said” on Netflix. It has lots of really uncomfortable scenes but I highly recommend it anyway. One scene will make you feel better that it has never happened to you, speaking of “What’s the worst that can happen?” that isn’t even, it’s just socially awkward.
Oh my, that reminds me of when I was a kid and how I used to worry about getting beat up on the way to and from school, which was a very real possibility every single fu… (oops, I’m not trying to be a better person, but I’m trying not to swear) day, because kid world wasn’t overseen by adults in those days except to yell at you for not doing their bidding promptly enough. But as an adult, my worries are almost always about the potential for social awkwardness.
I mean, I guess I could worry about Stephen Harper getting us all blown up with our own weapons it’ll turn out we supplied the wrong terrorists with, but he’s just been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by Frank Dimant of B’nai Brith, so, you know, Alfred E.Neuman comes to mind.
“What, Me Worry?”
Just kidding. We should probably worry about Stephen Harper getting us all blown up, Nobel Peace Prize nomination or not.
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006